indico will be upgraded to the latest version on Tuesday 10th Decmeber. It may be unavailable all day.

Comparison and Applications of Different Scanning Methods using an Industrial Laser System Dedicated to Single Event Effects Testing

11 Sept 2024, 12:40
20m
Newton 2 (ESA-ESTEC)

Newton 2

ESA-ESTEC

Keplerlaan 1 NL-2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands
Oral Test Methodology for SEE Laser Testing Session: Test Methodology for SEE Laser Testing

Speaker

Sebastien JONATHAS (PULSCAN)

Description

In the field of single-event effects (SEE) testing, laser testing [1] is commonly used for different purposes. The most well-known application is probably the accurate mapping of SEE sensitive areas in a device, especially in the context of radiation-hardening of an integrated circuit (IC) design. Another application consists in screening different components against critical events like single-event latch-up (SEL). Providing an estimation of the sensitive area (cross section) for specific types of events is also a result that is commonly expected from a laser test campaign. For practical reasons related especially to the duration of the test campaign, it is usually not possible to scan a complete chip at the highest available resolution (i.e. smallest scanning step). Thus, a trade-off needs to be found between the scanning resolution and the scanning time. The result of this trade-off depends on several factors like the priority objectives of the test, the time needed to acquire data from the device-under-test (DUT), and the scanning method, which we define as the way to deliver the laser pulse to the DUT vs space and time.
We present a comparison of the various scanning methods available with our Pulsys-Rad industrial laser system for SEE testing [2]. Beyond the classical method that consists in doing a stop-and-go successively at each point of a regular 2D grid in order to trigger a laser pulse and acquire data at each point [3,4,5], we introduce complementary or alternative scanning methods that provide more options and flexibility when preparing the design of experiment (DoE) of a laser testing campaign. The benefits of each method in terms of scan duration, area coverage and accuracy of SEE localization are presented and discussed as a function of the test constraints, priority objectives, and practical considerations. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each method enables optimizing the efficiency of a DoE. We illustrate the discussion with experimental results obtained on the AMD Xilinx Zynq-7000 system-on-chip (SoC) using the different scanning methods with backside single-photon absorption laser testing.

Primary author

Co-author

Mr David HORAIN (PULSCAN)

Presentation materials